tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7665342107723336257.post179509209043200137..comments2023-02-13T03:38:13.649-05:00Comments on LaMarotte: Pyramid RevisitedADhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06408980212433714362noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7665342107723336257.post-46956128757694776082011-06-15T13:25:36.822-04:002011-06-15T13:25:36.822-04:00Thanks you, thank you, thank you.
Just as I thou...Thanks you, thank you, thank you. <br /><br />Just as I thought. And the image of a turning top is delightful. It completely supports the idea that modern, industiralized or, should I say Service dependent economies are more dependent than ever on motion, rapid exchange, the spinning, the churn. Scary stuff really.<br /><br />And John, you're right. Back in the 1950s, of course, Manufacturing was king. In 1950 the goods producing sectors (the bottom two categories of the pyramid--Manufacturing and what Arsen calles A/M/F/F) represented 40.8% of GDP. In 2009 that figure was 17.7%...Moniquehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10736499939969754097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7665342107723336257.post-35647815861485159412011-06-14T23:33:50.149-04:002011-06-14T23:33:50.149-04:00Now, wouldn't it be interesting to compare tha...Now, wouldn't it be interesting to compare that chart with previous decades? Offhand, I suspect that it looked a heck of a lot more like a pyramid in the 1950s.John Mageehttp://patioboat.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.com