My subject is feedback. Or management. Or the nature of
too-highly-layered hierarchies. Consider an efficient hierarchy. It will be
three-layered at most—and each layer will communicate with the one next to it
face to face. In such a situation, people will be talking to each other—and
what with frequent contact, will become familiar with each other at the
personal level. Our current institutions are vastly more complicated—at least
twelve levels in most cases. Furthermore, the chain of command will be further
confused by the intrusions of committees. Very often the feedback from
customers or clients will come to the top in the completely faded form of pure
numbers on a spreadsheet—whereas, when the scale is human, the bad or good news
will take the form of a person making a report, one human to another. The
problem of size, simply, is that a spreadsheet never frowns—but people do. And
when the next layer down arrives at the office with a dark face, one must be
prepared to do something about it.
Supposing you were a high-flying trader who sold toxic real
estate bonds directly to “widows and orphans”—as Fabrice Tourre, formerly of
Goldman Sachs, told his girlfriend that he had done. And suppose the uncles, brothers,
or cousins or other muscular relations of those widows and orphans had gotten a
hold of Fabrice Tourre and applied to him the “feedback” of beating him to
within an inch of his life? He would have learned a whole lot earlier that he
was breaking the rules of morality. But twelve-layered hierarchies protected
him until now. And he may still get away with it shielded by hosts of
high-priced lawyers.
No comments:
Post a Comment