The first of these shows scandals at the federal level and by historical period. The periods are not the same length, to be sure. 1776 to 1899 is 124 years, the 2010-2011 period is less then two full years. But I’ve normalized these so that, what you see is average number of scandals per annum.
Just look at those bars rising with time! Do we credit the media? Population growth, growth in population density (as in nothing propinqs like propinquity), is it a decline in morals or a increase in shameless self-display? We shall never know.
And this is, as the second chart shows, not a federal achievement. The state and locals are doing just fine. In effect, in 2010, the S&Ls were particularly randy, scoring a scandal victory by certainly more than a nose-length.
I’ve only modified incoming Wiki-data in two cases. In 2011 I added the single case of our IMF Chief's alleged episode, headline news today; and in that same year, for the S&L category, I’ve added, by way of a terminator, the revelations from California. My source is here, specifically two lists cited at the end of the See Also heading.
I should like to propose an International Support Group for all "Chauds Lapins" everywhere. Included as founding members might be B. Clinton, Berlusconi, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and perhaps several of our congressional eminences. They need all the support they can provide for each other, after all...
ReplyDeletePerhaps a new metric is needed:
ReplyDeleteHow many Internet Memes are created by the incident.
(10 years ago I would have suggested how many Saturday Night Live skits were created)
What we needs are automatic internet meme counters launched every second by the Bureau of Internet Statistics--and omniscience would finally dawn. But the skits were more fun...
ReplyDelete