Yesterday I showed data on Social Security income and
expenditures. Today I am showing similar data for the Medicare Trust Funds.
That is a plural because three programs are found within Medicare. Of these one
is Hospital Insurance (HI), one is Supplemental Medical Insurance (SMI) which
comes in two parts, B and D. Part B pays for doctors visits and outpatient
care, Part D pays for pharmaceuticals. In the following graphic, I show income and
expenditure data for all three combined for 1990, 1995, and for 2000-2012. Data
to 2010 are from the Statistical
Abstract (link);
data for 2011 and 2012 are from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, the federal
agency (link).
Notable here—in contrast to the data for Social Security—is
that the income stream matches the outflow in benefits much more closely. In
the thirteen-year 2000-2012 period, income exceeded or matched expenditures in
ten years, fell below expenditures in three. The other significant difference
is that Social Security income consists entirely of earmarked tax revenues from
the public and interest earnings, while the Medicare Trust Funds rely much more
heavily on general revenues and other sources of income. The following
tabulation makes that clear:
Medicare Trust Funds Income in 2011
|
||
$ bil.
|
Percent
|
|
Payroll/Premiums
|
259.9
|
49.2
|
General
Revenues
|
225.2
|
42.7
|
State
Contributions
|
6.5
|
1.2
|
Interest
|
20.7
|
3.9
|
All
other
|
15.7
|
3.0
|
Income
|
528.0
|
100.0
|
Expenditures
|
560.3
|
106.1
|
The reason why Medicare is of such interest to would-be
budget-cutters is the large role that general revenues represent in Medicare.
It is 42.7 percent but would have to be more like 46 percent for these trust
funds to have broken even in 2011. If the GOP had wished to insist on making
Medicare altogether self-supporting, it would have loaded the aging population
with $257.5 billion in out-of-pocket expenditures. Not taking care of our
elderly—unless they’re rich. Is that what Free Market dictates at the moment?
Now as for Medicaid, which is designed for the poor, that’s
entirely funded from general revenues. If that is chopped away from the budget
as well, we’ll be well on our way to recreating the glorious days of Dickensian
England.
No comments:
Post a Comment