Tax Rates in 2002
| ||
At least
|
But no more than
|
Tax Rate
|
0
|
12,000
|
10%
|
12,000
|
46,700
|
15%
|
46,700
|
112,850
|
27%
|
112,850
|
171,950
|
30%
|
171,950
|
307,050
|
35%
|
307,050
|
Sky's the limit
|
38.6%
|
Tax Rates in 2012
| ||
At least
|
But no more than
|
Tax Rate
|
0
|
17,400
|
10%
|
17,400
|
70,700
|
15%
|
70,700
|
142,700
|
25%
|
142,700
|
217,450
|
28%
|
217,450
|
388,350
|
33%
|
388,350
|
Sky's the limit
|
35%
|
These rates are for a married couple filing jointly. Please note that these structures are not comparable—even if we ignore the tax rates. The rates apply to differently sized increments of income. To illustrate this, let’s calculate the taxes due on an income of $69,677, which just happens to be the average household income in 2011.
Income of $69,677 Taxed at 2002 and 2012 Rates
| |||
2002 Rates Applied
|
2012 Rates Applied
| ||
Increment
|
Tax due
|
Increment
|
Tax due
|
12,000
|
1,200
|
17,400
|
1,740
|
34,700
|
5,205
|
52,277
|
7,842
|
22,977
|
6,204
| ||
69,677
|
12,609
|
69,677
|
9,582
|
Notice that in 2002, a portion of the total income was taxed at 27 percent, not so in 2012. In 2012 the maximum of the 15 percent increment was higher than the $69,677. If 2002 tax rates come into effect next year, the tax bite on this income, a national average, increases by 31.5 percent, by $3,027 a year, and $252 per month.
Let me now look at a range of incomes. For this purpose I’ve selected the top or maximum earnings of the first four quintiles (fifth) of households, the lowest income of the fifth or top quintile, and then, for good measure, an income of $250,000 and one of $1 million. First the tabular results:
Earnings
|
2002 Tax
|
2012 Tax
|
Difference
| |
Top of lowest quintile
|
20,262
|
2,439
|
2,169
|
270
|
Top of Second quintile
|
38,520
|
5,178
|
4,908
|
270
|
Top of Third quintile
|
62,434
|
10,653
|
8,495
|
2,158
|
Top of Fourth quintile
|
101,582
|
21,223
|
18,073
|
3,150
|
Bottom of Fifth quintile
|
186,000
|
46,913
|
42,165
|
4,748
|
Earning $250,000
|
250,000
|
69,313
|
62,993
|
6,321
|
Earning $1 million
|
1,000,000
|
356,759
|
347,512
|
9,247
|
These results, graphed, bring home why it is that the political battles rage about the top layers—which are the last three groupings in the table and the chart. To be sure, $270 is a huge amount of money for a household earning a shade over $20,000. And a shade over $9,000 could not possibly bother a millionaire very much. But you get the picture:
Both in terminology and in likely effect, that phrase, Fiscal Cliff, is fear mongering. There is pain here, to be sure, but it is much more like slipping and falling on an icy sidewalk than a drop off a cliff. And, let us not forget, most millionaires do not get their income in earnings, taxable at these rates, but in capital gains, taxed at a much lower percent.
No comments:
Post a Comment