Soon to be followed by Tuesday
Night RAW. These will not be brought to us by World Wrestling Entertainment
(WWE), a much nobler institution than our two political parties. “Nobler?” you
ask? Am I not just a bit irreverent? No, sir! WWE knows that it is doing and
does not attempt to cover itself in anything except tongue-in-cheek glory and
well-earned profits. It knows the business it is in. It’s called Entertainment.
Nor are the fans of wrestling much deceived, when they root for Sheamus against
The Miz, into thinking that in some way they’re taking part in saving the world
from approaching Armageddon. It’s just bread for them and circuses for us. But
as for those vice- and presidential debates, where the referee almost trembles
in his or her honor to preside over the fray, they need to get with the program.
The next time, say for next Tuesday Night’s RAW, wouldn’t it be a lot more
genuinely entertaining to watch CM
Punk take on Antonio Cesaro? I think so. Ahead of it, to be sure, two
emissaries, one from each campaign, could
exchange white papers in which each candidate would present a detailed, written
description of his policies—to be printed in newspapers of record. Then on to
the breathless fun of it all. I’d also stay around for the following Shields
and Brooks as these two gentlemen try their best to explain just why the Punk
won or perhaps lost—register their views on the miserable or horrid refereeing—and
what that odd sack filled with something
might have contained that that cute cheerleader, wearing a crown, threw at the
wrestlers just before Cesaro smacked the Punk down at the end, or did Punk slip
on something?
Oil shortages lead to hidden conflicts–even war
3 weeks ago
Sometimes, irreverence is the only sane response to things that have gotten so clearly out of control...
ReplyDelete