Instead of “taxation with representation” we have gradually
made a transition to “taxation with titular
representation.” Representatives are elected in Congressional districts and in
States and, in a formal, titular way, they represent the public
residing in those geographical regions.
The problem is that getting elected requires an enormous
amount of money. I know that’s true because a member of our family ran for
Congress a few years back and I have personal experience to back up what is
commonly repeated in the media and backed by published statistics. After a
person is elected, especially to the House, where the term is a mere two years,
the need to raise new funds, for the next election, begins almost at once.
Under such circumstances, the tendency is very strong for the legislator to “represent”
the biggest sources of his or her funding rather than the masses who contribute
very little. Who pays the piper calls the tune.
Okay. This is
rocket science. It’s difficult because we cannot see, touch, feel, and taste motivation. We have to infer it. We don’t
have time to shadow the legislator’s every move and record his/her every
statement, read every piece of paper he/she sees. But if money matters a whole
lot, those who have the most should be harvesting the biggest benefits from
legislation.
I show a chart taken from a Congressional Research Service
(CRS) report that issued this September (link).†
Understanding that graphic is not
rocket science, however.
Nothing on LaMarotte
should be read as advocacy. I’m personally sure that the state of a society
always mirrors the state of the individuals in it. No mechanical fixes, reforms,
stratagems, or devices (like public funding of elections) change things.
Societies are too vast and complex to be ruled by anything other than
inspiration—meaning the deepest convictions that move the most people. When
things have come to this state, very serious troubles loom ahead. They will
eventually produce vast public trauma. And that trauma will, in turn, erase our
democratic institutions except (that word again) in titular form. Will
oligarchies rule us forever? No. This sort of thing eventually produces a kind
of dictatorship but under exalted names—and the ruler will be the enemy of the
oligarchy. That’s the way we’re going. Advocacy, no. But I like to know what
lies ahead.
---------------
† Thomas L. Hungerford, Congressional Research Service, Taxes and the Economy: An Economic Analysis
of the top Tax Rates Since 1945, September 14, 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment